<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ustonson Reel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.antiquetackleobserver.com/2010/02/27/ustonson-reel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.antiquetackleobserver.com/2010/02/27/ustonson-reel/</link>
	<description>A depository for information on the history of fishing tackle.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 16:23:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Durwood M. Dugger</title>
		<link>http://www.antiquetackleobserver.com/2010/02/27/ustonson-reel/comment-page-1/#comment-1024</link>
		<dc:creator>Durwood M. Dugger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 17:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiquetackleobserver.com/?p=550#comment-1024</guid>
		<description>Though I haven&#039;t read Graham&#039;s new book, as a scientist and a reel collector I am very skeptical of the Ustonson multiplying reel with a manual line leveler from 1760. Has there been scientific authentication of the reel?  My skepticism comes from the reel being too far out of its technological time line - with no apparently no attempts by other reel makers of the period to note or copy this highly advanced example. Something very atypical of markets of the period that sought to copy royal commissioned products such as this. Has there been any metallurgical analysis with comparison to reels from Uston shop of the same period (copper tin ratio and ore origins) to confirm similar brass suppliers, a micro-analysis and comparison of tooling marks, (hand driven laths make distinctive marks compared constant rotational speed power equipment) to other Ustonson and or a documented listing of this particular reel on a Royal inventory - which could support Grahams  expert opinion? Without scientific support information, I certainly find this reel a little &quot;too good to be authentic.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Though I haven&#8217;t read Graham&#8217;s new book, as a scientist and a reel collector I am very skeptical of the Ustonson multiplying reel with a manual line leveler from 1760. Has there been scientific authentication of the reel?  My skepticism comes from the reel being too far out of its technological time line &#8211; with no apparently no attempts by other reel makers of the period to note or copy this highly advanced example. Something very atypical of markets of the period that sought to copy royal commissioned products such as this. Has there been any metallurgical analysis with comparison to reels from Uston shop of the same period (copper tin ratio and ore origins) to confirm similar brass suppliers, a micro-analysis and comparison of tooling marks, (hand driven laths make distinctive marks compared constant rotational speed power equipment) to other Ustonson and or a documented listing of this particular reel on a Royal inventory &#8211; which could support Grahams  expert opinion? Without scientific support information, I certainly find this reel a little &#8220;too good to be authentic.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Todd Larson</title>
		<link>http://www.antiquetackleobserver.com/2010/02/27/ustonson-reel/comment-page-1/#comment-919</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Todd Larson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 20:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiquetackleobserver.com/?p=550#comment-919</guid>
		<description>Thanks for doing the review in Classic Angling. I&#039;ve been prompted to review the book myself here in America but to be honest, I didn&#039;t have any idea where to begin. So the behemoth went on the shelf with a big &quot;thud&quot; and now it just stares at me. It was an admirable thing to undertake such a daunting task and I tip my cap to you, as I happened to agree with almost all of what you wrote.

-- Dr. Todd</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for doing the review in Classic Angling. I&#8217;ve been prompted to review the book myself here in America but to be honest, I didn&#8217;t have any idea where to begin. So the behemoth went on the shelf with a big &#8220;thud&#8221; and now it just stares at me. It was an admirable thing to undertake such a daunting task and I tip my cap to you, as I happened to agree with almost all of what you wrote.</p>
<p>&#8211; Dr. Todd</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stefan Duma</title>
		<link>http://www.antiquetackleobserver.com/2010/02/27/ustonson-reel/comment-page-1/#comment-917</link>
		<dc:creator>Stefan Duma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 17:37:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiquetackleobserver.com/?p=550#comment-917</guid>
		<description>Yes send them over and Iwill try and help.

Stef</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes send them over and Iwill try and help.</p>
<p>Stef</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Adams</title>
		<link>http://www.antiquetackleobserver.com/2010/02/27/ustonson-reel/comment-page-1/#comment-916</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 17:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiquetackleobserver.com/?p=550#comment-916</guid>
		<description>Thanks Steff, a font of knowledge as always, could I send  you a PM and send a few photos of a couple of reels, I would appreciate your critique &amp; expertise on them. my email you have on the submit form. 
Thanks Paul</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Steff, a font of knowledge as always, could I send  you a PM and send a few photos of a couple of reels, I would appreciate your critique &amp; expertise on them. my email you have on the submit form.<br />
Thanks Paul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stefan Duma</title>
		<link>http://www.antiquetackleobserver.com/2010/02/27/ustonson-reel/comment-page-1/#comment-915</link>
		<dc:creator>Stefan Duma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 22:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiquetackleobserver.com/?p=550#comment-915</guid>
		<description>I believe it was, he also made darts, pipes and target boards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe it was, he also made darts, pipes and target boards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Adams</title>
		<link>http://www.antiquetackleobserver.com/2010/02/27/ustonson-reel/comment-page-1/#comment-914</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 20:36:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiquetackleobserver.com/?p=550#comment-914</guid>
		<description>Hi Steff
I look forward to hearing your thoughts as always, So if Ustonson never made reels as you say, was him getting the honour below just for wood turning? I`ve included the link where I found it at the bottom... Cheers Paul

Past Masters of the Worshipful Company of Turners, 1593 to date
Elected Annually on Ascension Day. Prior to the grant of the Royal Charter in 1604, the Company was governed by two Wardens: 1593 - 1603 James Dagger, Thomas Gurnell and Robert Ratcliff.

1783 - Onesimus Ustonson
1818 - John Ustonson
http://www.turnersco.com/masters.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Steff<br />
I look forward to hearing your thoughts as always, So if Ustonson never made reels as you say, was him getting the honour below just for wood turning? I`ve included the link where I found it at the bottom&#8230; Cheers Paul</p>
<p>Past Masters of the Worshipful Company of Turners, 1593 to date<br />
Elected Annually on Ascension Day. Prior to the grant of the Royal Charter in 1604, the Company was governed by two Wardens: 1593 &#8211; 1603 James Dagger, Thomas Gurnell and Robert Ratcliff.</p>
<p>1783 &#8211; Onesimus Ustonson<br />
1818 &#8211; John Ustonson<br />
<a href="http://www.turnersco.com/masters.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.turnersco.com/masters.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

